マイクロ波と頭部へ障害についての論文

 

• 12,047TOTAL VIEWS

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Neurol., 04 August 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00753

Pulsed Microwave Energy Transduction of Acoustic Phonon Related Brain Injury

Graham K. Hubler1, Stuart W. Hoffman2, Tim D. Andreadis3 and Ralph G. DePalma4,5*

• 1The School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
• 2US Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
• 3U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Tactical Electronic Warfare Division, Washington, DC, United States
• 4US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
• 5Department of Surgery, Uniformed University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States

Pulsed microwaves above specific energy thresholds have been reported to cause brain injury in animal models. The actual physical mechanism causing brain damage is unexplained while the clinical reality of these injuries remains controversial. Here we propose mechanisms by which pulsed microwaves may injure brain tissue by transduction of microwave energy into damaging acoustic phonons in brain water. We have shown that low intensity explosive blast waves likely initiate phonon excitations in brain tissues. Brain injury in this instance occurs at nanoscale subcellular levels as predicted by physical consideration of phonon interactions in brain water content. The phonon mechanism may also explain similarities between primary non-impact blast-induced mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and recent clinical and imaging findings of unexplained brain injuries observed in US embassy personnel possibly due to directed radiofrequency radiation. We describe experiments to elucidate mechanisms, RF frequencies and power levels by which pulsed microwaves potentially injure brain tissue. Pathological documentation of nanoscale brain blast injury has been supported experimentally using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrating nanoscale cellular damage in the absence of gross or light microscopic findings. Similar studies are required to better define pulsed microwave brain injury. Based upon existing findings, clinical diagnosis of both low intensity blast and microwave-induced brain injury likely will require diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a specialized water based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique.

Introduction

Swanson et al. (1) examined 24 US Cuban embassy personnel exposed to an unknown directed energy source. They found that 21 of those examined had clinical findings similar to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). All 24 individuals reported audible and sometimes painful sounds during possible exposures. Hoffer et al. (2) examined a partially overlapping group of 35 embassy-related individuals, among whom 25 reported auditory phenomena and post incident symptoms along with 10 individuals who lived with the affected persons who did not report hearing sounds. These workers found that all 25 individuals hearing sounds had vestibular abnormalities; over half of these exhibited cognitive disorders. The ten individuals who did not report hearing sounds did not exhibit vestibular or cognitive abnormalities. Verma et al. (3) expanded Swanson's 2018 report to include 40 government employees describing acoustic experiences. These individuals had neurological symptoms suggesting mTBI. Significant brain structural abnormalities were documented using advanced specialized MRI imaging of this cohort (3).

The method of delivery of damaging energy to these personnel remains controversial. A sonic source initially was postulated because subjects heard high-pitched sounds during the incidents (4–8). Lin (6, 7) suggested the mode of attack as a possible directed energy source of pulsed microwaves based on observations that pulsed microwaves are audible to those irradiated. Microwaves can also be focused into narrow field-of-view beams in order to target individuals.

Experimental evidence indicates that pulsed microwaves can induce disruption in brain tissue producing subsequent behavioral and cognitive dysfunction. Thomas et al. (9) early reported that pulsed microwaves disrupted acquisition performance in rats. Wang and Lai (10) later demonstrated that acute exposures to pulsed microwaves impaired reference memory in rats. In addition, pulsed microwaves reportedly may alter blood-brain barrier permeability, disrupt long-term potentiation and result in DNA strand breaks (11). Pakhomov and Murphy (12) reviewed an extensive body of microwave experiments performed in Russia and the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In these works, animal brains were found to be considerably more sensitive to pulsed microwaves than to continuous wave microwaves; they concluded that microwave heating did not, at least primarily, cause this injury effect. Thermal sensors placed in rabbit brains showed no more than a 0.2°C temperature increase in animals displaying cognitive impairments.

Mechanisms by which pulsed microwave energy injure or impair the brain remain unclear. Based upon our prior physical considerations of low intensity primary blast and crystalline fracture effects (13, 14), we here describe physical mechanisms by which microwave energy may produce brain injuries similar to those caused by primary blast exposure. Using documented experimental physical findings, we consider the hypothesis that primary blast shock waves due to explosions and pulsed microwaves may both excite GHz frequency phonons in brain water content to cause nanoscale subcellular brain injuries.

Phonon Model of Brain Injury: Ultrastructural Effects

Based upon observation of failure wave effects in brittle solids (13), Kucherov et al. (14) developed a primary brain blast injury hypothesis based on water behaving as a brittle solid under shock wave blast loading. Calculation of brain cellular injury dimensions were based upon the fact that the water content of brain tissue is 70–80% and that of cerebrospinal fluid 100%. They postulated that shock waves from an explosive blast excited high frequency THz phonons in brain water (14, 15). Energy stored in optical phonons decays within nanoseconds to lower frequency acoustic phonons creating damage when brain tissue strength is exceeded. A phonon bottleneck occurs where the 7.5 GHz phonon (lowest frequency acoustic phonon in water) decays to the ground state (16, 17). Energy stored from higher frequency phonons pumps the amplitude of the 7.5 GHz phonon until water molecules rupture to disrupt brain tissue. When phonon generated waves have sufficiently high amplitude, tissue across the peaks of the phonon wavelength will be sheared. The resulting wavelength can be used to estimate the dimensions of tissue and cellular damage. Based upon the speed of sound in water (1,500 m/s) and a phonon frequency of 7.5 GHz, phonon associated brain damage was predicted to occur at ~200 nm intervals (200 nm = 1,500 m/s ÷ 7.5 × 109 cycles/s) at peaks of wave forms exceeding tissue strength (14). Injury dimensions would measure ~3–6 nm approximating the dimensions of cell membranes and other intracellular structures.

To test this hypothesis, Song et al. (18, 19) subjected mice to open field blasts using 350 g of C4 explosive. Mice were placed 2.1, 3, 5, and 7 meters from a blast source (18). Cognitive and behavioral testing showed that deficit severity correlated with closeness to the blast, overpressure and impulse exposure. Subsequent TEM of these brains showed nanoscale intracellular neuronal damage consistent with damage dimensions predicted by phonon injury assuming 100% water brain content (19). Shock damage occurs within microseconds as the shock wave passes though the brain at the speed of sound in water, in contrast to milliseconds required for inertial or impact injuries. Cellular damage occurs in well-documented absence of head motion at blast exposures approximating 47–87 kPa (18, 19). These observations support the hypothesis that 7.5 GHz acoustic phonons in brain water content likely explain nanoscale brain damage in non-impact low intensity blast exposures. Since gross and light microscopic changes are absent under these circumstances, detection of subcellular damage as a result of microwave exposure suggests use of TEM. Gross examination and conventional light microscopy should be supplemented by TEM. This is yet to be done for microwave brain injury. Similarly, as in low intensity blast exposures, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a water-based imaging technique, will likely be required to detect clinical microwave effects invisible to conventional imaging.

Microwave Effects on Auditory System and Brain Tissue

We consider microwave frequency ranges and wavelengths from 300 MHz (1 m) to 10 GHz (3 cm) in air where availability of microwave sources coherent on short time scales (i.e., 50 μs) exist. The permittivity and conductivity of white and gray brain matter are shown in Figure 1 (20). Figure 2 shows the depth into brain tissue where the microwave energy is ~1/2.7 of incident energy. Note that microwave wavelengths in air and brain tissue are functions of microwave frequency. The microwave wavelengths in brain tissue range from 0.5 to 18 cm with 1/2.7 attenuation depths of 0.2–4 cm. The dominant interaction of 1–10 GHz microwave frequencies in water relate to absorption at a “Debye” peak at these lower microwave frequencies related to migration defects through the H bond water network (21).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Experimentally determined conductivity and permittivity of white and gray matter vs. RF frequency (19). Conductivity is used to calculate the penetration depth into brain tissue (called skin depth in electromagnetic nomenclature). Permittivity is used to calculate the microwave wavelength in brain tissue.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Microwaves in air and in brain vs. microwave frequency. Calculated depth of penetration of microwaves into the brain is shown. Energy is reduced by a factor 1/2.7 at a superficial level termed “skin depth” using electromagnetic nomenclature.

Microwave interactions with the human head were early described by Frey et al. (22) (first reported microwave effects upon the auditory system). His detailed descriptions were designated as the Frey Effect (22). Subsequently, Lin et al. (23) clarified the fact that square microwave pulses are audible. Experimental modeling determined that the microwave pulse rapidly heats tissue in the “skin” brain depth (depth of 1/2.7 of incident energy). Figure 2 shows that 0.3–10 GHz microwave radiation penetrates a few cm to a few mm into brain tissue. The resulting thermal expansion may launch an acoustic wave by thermoelastic effect traveling by bone conduction to the inner ear where it activates cochlear receptors (23). A single microwave pulse may thus be perceived as an acoustic click while a train of microwave pulses is sensed as an audible tone with a pitch corresponding to the pulse repetition rate.

Watanabe et al. (24) employed finite differential analysis to model the effect of 1 mW/cm2, 915 MHz single 20 μs wide square pulses (rise time 400 ns) incident upon the back of realistic human head models. These workers found that thermoelastic coupling of microwave energy into the brain occurred near the brain surface, launching an acoustic wave propagating to the opposite side of the head at the speed of sound in water and reverberating up to several times. Reverberation frequencies were found to range from 7 to 9 kHz as determined by the transit times across a 14 cm skull cavity. Use of a 50 μs pulse length with a repetition rate of 7–9 kHz maximized energy coupling to brain tissue (24). Longer pulses or higher repetition rates produced destructive interferences that canceled some of the impinging microwave energy. Other than the skin depth dependence, this mechanism may be similar for any microwave frequency in the 0.3–10 GHz range, dependent mainly on the frequency with which the microwave pulses are delivered.

We now present three other possible head-microwave interactions not previously considered.

1) Wieland et al. (25) employed a cyclotron x-ray light source and x-ray diffraction to measure actual displacements in bovine bone samples. They detected strains as small as 8 × 10−6 due to the resulting inverse piezoelectric effect which induces strain due to applied electric field (25). Strains as large as 9 × 10−4 were detected with electric field exposures of ~6,000 V/m or ~6 V/mm. Amplitude of microwave exposure of 1 volt/mm resulted in a sizable strain of 1.5 × 104. Measurements of bone dielectric properties indicate that molecules in bone also respond to low GHz radiation values (20)1. Sufficiently large microwave power could send energy to the ear directly through the bone sensed by affected individuals as painful and damaging to hearing. Pulsed microwave energy may also launch acoustic waves into the brain tissue adjacent to the skull at the same frequency. Figure 3A shows a schematic representation of this possible mechanism of bone piezoelectric effects coupling microwave energy into phonons in brain tissue through piezoelectric response of skull bone.

2) A shock wave created by a sudden strain induced in bone of the skull is another possible transduction mechanism inducing launch of acoustic phonons in brain water. Here, the pulse rise time of the microwaves may be an important parameter. If, for example, the rise time of the microwave pulse is as rapid as (7.5 GHz)−1 or 0.13 ns, this level of acoustic shock could excite the lowest acoustic phonon in water with a 7.5 GHz frequency (13–15). With sufficient power, such energy could initiate a damage mechanism as occurs in explosive shock with skull bone rippling, Figure 3B schematically depicts this effect.

3) While electromagnetic radiation is known to transduce to optical phonons, electromagnetic radiation was not earlier believed capable of acoustic phonon coupling. However, Nelson et al. (26), using “Laser Induced Phonons” (LIPS) methodology, demonstrated that electromagnetic radiation is capable of coupling to acoustic phonons in absorbing liquids. These investigators used two ~532 nm lasers with slightly different wavelengths to produce a difference interference wavelength tunable in the 1–30 GHz region by tuning one of the lasers. The absorbed light heats the liquid at the peaks of the differing laser wavelength, causing thermal expansion, thus launching acoustic waves at that specific wavelength. A secondary laser probe diffracted by the momentary diffraction grating generated by the peaks of the acoustic waves then detects resulting acoustic phonons within the liquid. Figure 3C is a schematic representation of non-uniform heating phenomena capable of transducing microwave energy into acoustic phonon waves in brain tissue.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. (A) Mechanism of bone peizoelectric effects in launching phonons in brain tissue water. (B) Schematic representation of transduction of fast rise-time pulsed microwaves to acoustic phonons in brain tissue through the shock response of the inverse piezoelectric effect in the bone of the skull. (C) Schematic representation of transduction of pulsed microwaves to acoustic waves in brain through the thermoelectric effect in brain tissue water.

Experimental laser diffraction grating effects do not disappear immediately after 100 ps (ps) excitation pulses end. The effect persists for many microseconds, suggesting that short (~ps) relaxation times of rotational states cause water to sustain large spatial temperature gradients for relatively long-time intervals (21). This effect implies that non-uniform heating of water could also launch high frequency acoustic waves. Thus, a third possible mechanism coupling microwave energy into acoustic phonons may be rapid heating of water in the brain tissue at the peaks of the microwave waveforms. In this case, microwaves heat water directly rather than by the interference effects of two optical wavelength lasers. The net end results of phonon generation appear to be similar.

Rapid heating can cause thermal expansion (the thermoelastic effect) exciting acoustic waves in water at the frequency of the incident microwaves. Brain tissue may be especially susceptible to excitation of an intrinsic acoustic phonon at a frequency of 7.5 GHz due to its increased lifetime as compared to other frequencies. Figure 4 shows the phonon wavelengths in water vs. phonon frequency. Note the phonon effects are also active at these lower wavelengths.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Phonon wavelengths in water vs. phonon frequency (wavelength = sound velocity/frequency).

Microwave pulses or short rise time pulses may therefore excite phonons by several mechanisms. We hypothesize that, (i) the inverse piezoelectric effect in the skull, (ii) fast rise-time shock, (iii) and microwave absorption in water in the brain are all capable of launching acoustic waves that produce the sounds heard by targeted subjects through the Frey Effect (22). With sufficient energy input, brain damage likely occurs by a phonon energy mechanisms exceeding brain tissue strength (13, 14). The efficacy of these mechanisms to produce brain damage also depends upon microwave frequency as shown in Figure 4 along with microwave pulse rise-time.

Discussion

Incident durations described by injured personnel are as follows: “The sound seemed to manifest in pulses of varying lengths – seven seconds, 12 seconds, two seconds – with some sustained periods of several minutes or more. Then there would be silence for a second, or 13 seconds, or four seconds, before the sound abruptly started again” (5). The repetition rate from the AP news report (5) claimed to be a central frequency of 7,266 Hz with several frequencies spaced 200 Hz on either side of 7,266 Hz. The microwave frequency within the pulses and the pulse width of the microwaves triggering the audible effect remain unknown.

Igarashi et al. (27) showed 50% mortality with extensive gross brain damage in rats directly exposed at close range to a single high pulse of 3 kW, 2.45 GHz microwaves for 0.1 s. Based upon the size of the rats and the microwave horn used, we estimate the incident power density to be ~1 kW/cm2 which would deliver to the target an average power of 1,000 W/cm2 (27). By contrast, a 30-min application of 2.8 GHz pulses using power as low as 15-mWcm−2 was seen to damage rat brains (10). In the absence of known experimental threshold power inducing brain damage, we suggest initially beginning with a minimum average power delivered in a focused microwave beam to ~1 Wcm2. For a 7 kHz repetition rate using 50 μs pulses, the individual pulse power at target would be ~1 Wcm−2/duty cycle = ~3 Wcm−2. These estimated values are useful stating points for empiric experimental observations.

Lin et al. (6, 7) suggested that pulsed microwaves were the likely means by which the U.S. Cuban embassy personnel were injured. However, the precise mechanisms by which microwaves cause brain injury require delineation. To reiterate, we propose that microwaves can transduce acoustic waves in brain water by three possible mechanisms: (i) inverse bone piezoelectric effects, (ii) fast pulse rise-time shock affecting bone, and (iii) thermoelastic absorption, at GHz frequencies. We present hypotheses on how pulsed microwave transduced acoustic waves from a directed energy beam with specific characteristics induce nanometer scale intracellular brain damage. Such damage is likely, as with low intensity blast, best detected by TEM (18, 19). Clinical detection of imaging abnormalities requires use of DTI, a water imaging technique. The hypothesis that dimensions of injury due to microwave brain tissue may be similar to that of coupling of low intensity primary shock wave energy causing blast-induced (mTBI) requires experimental verification. The commonality of dimensions of phonon excitation may account for these dimensional similarities. Later symptoms displayed by embassy personnel also appear to mimic injury characteristics of mTBI caused by primary low-level blast (1–3). In addition to presenting a consistent physical nanoscale model of brain damage, the present working hypothesis may also explain why pulsed microwaves are more damaging than continuous wave microwaves. Threshold characteristics of differing pulsed wave microwave energies damage remain to be determined.

Microwave exposure alters blood brain barrier permeability to cause DNA damage (11, 12). Blood brain injury also is known to occur in blast injury but is much better described (28–30). A critical review by Zhi et al. (31) concluded that animal studies remain conflicting and inconclusive. The magnitude of the microwave energetics under consideration, compared to high level blast effects causing hollow organ and lung damage, is orders of magnitude less. Energies involved in this injury compare to those found in low level blast effects ranging from ~47 kPa to levels <100 kPa resulting in nanoscale injuries in the absence of gross or microscopic organ damage (18). Long term studies of single or pulsed microwave injuries resulting in chronic glial or astrocytic effects have not been done, while limited data on blood brain barrier effects imply endothelial vacuolization in the olfactory region (11, 12). High explosive blasts have long been known to generate wide wavelength microwaves likely with differing effects than the short-wave high frequency microwaves here considered (32).

Further studies of apparently conflicting data are required (31). Postulated microwave brain damage has yet to be fully characterized experimentally. The present analysis of injury mechanisms is based upon well-founded physical principles and observations. Exploration of exposure times, power and specific microwave wavelengths here considered can serve to define dimensions of microwave brain injury, optimal diagnostic methods, and eventual protective measures. Limitations of the present theory include the need to postulate three hypotheses possibly inducing phonon generation in water. These alternative possibilities suggest several approaches to experimental exploration.

We here have presented physical theory, injury hypotheses and biological findings related to microwave brain damage. These injuries can be explored by exposure of animal models to varying microwave exposure times, power, frequencies, and pulses including magnitude and frequency as compared to controls. Subsequent neurobehavioral testing followed by comprehensive examination of brain tissues including TEM will be needed to uncover ultrastructural damage. Parameters of microwave power thresholds, frequency, duration and pulse characteristics causing specific types of brain injury require varying types of experimental exposures. An initial starting point of 7 kHz repetition rate using 50 μs pulses, the individual pulse power at a murine target of ~1 Wcm−2/duty cycle = ~3 Wcm−2 is suggested. Microwave skull interactions require exploration using pulsed microwave exposure of diploic skull bone or piezoelectric bone surrogates in vitro adjacent to 0.9% isotonic saline. High frequency transducers attached to bone and in adjacent water can be used detect high frequency transduced acoustic waves. Thermoelastic phonon generation mechanism in normal saline solution alone could also be explored using direct microwave exposure to study basic aspects in vitro phonon generation in water. Data thus obtained in vitro can be used to guide initial specific parameters of power, wavelength and pulse frequency likely to cause in vivo microwave brain injury.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

RD, TA, and SH are fulltime government employees. GH is consultant in physics at the School of Medicine, University of Missouri at Columbia Missouri. This work was funded as part of their duties.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank James Hirvonen for critical reading of the manuscript. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the University of Missouri, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Naval Research Laboratory, the Department of Defense or the Government of the United States.

Footnote

1. ^Most crystals exhibit THz phonon frequencies. Thus, atoms in crystals will be displaced by the inverse piezoelectric effect at 1–10 GHz frequencies with relatively low efficiency.

15,000人の専門家が子供へのCOVID-19ワクチンに反対する理由 Why 15,000 experts oppose COVID-19 vaccines for children

 

WND TV　 https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/4967730/より

 

Here's why 15,000 experts oppose COVID-19 vaccines for children

15,000人の専門家が子供へのCOVID-19ワクチンに反対する理由

'The risk-benefit analysis isn't even close'

「リスクとベネフィットが比較にならないほど乖離」

By Art Moore
Published December 13, 2021 at 7:20pm

Share on Facebook Tweet Share to Gab Email Print

Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune in North Carolina began administering the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to pediatric beneficiaries ages 5-11 years old on Nov. 17, 2021. (U.S. Navy photo by Michelle Cornell)

写真：ノースカロライナ州にある海軍医療センター・キャンプ・ルジューンでは、2021年11月17日より、5～11歳の小児の受益者に対してファイザー・バイオンテック社COVID-19ワクチン投与を開始(U.S. Navy photo by Michelle Cornell)

 

The inventor of the mRNA technology behind the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines has issued a video statement explaining why more than 15,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world have signed a declaration that healthy children should not be vaccinated for COVID-19.

ファイザー社とモデナ社のワクチンを支えるmRNA技術の発明者が、世界中の15,000人以上の医師や医学者が「健康な子供にCOVID-19を接種すべきではない」という宣言書に署名した理由を説明するビデオ声明を発表しました。

Dr. Robert W. Malone, who has worked for three decades in vaccine research and development, said he is "speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist."

ワクチンの研究開発に30年間携わってきたロバート・W・マローン博士は、"親、祖父母、医師、科学者としての意見を述べている "と述べています。

He explained he's been vaccinated for COVID and is generally pro-vaccination, having "devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases."

同氏は、COVIDのワクチンを接種したことがあると説明するとともに、「キャリアのすべてを、感染症の予防と治療のための安全で効果的な方法の開発に捧げてきた」ことから、一般的にはワクチン接種に賛成であるとしています。

But he warned parents that the decision to inject their children is "irreversible," and they need to be aware of "the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created."

しかし彼は、子供に注射するかどうかの判断は "不可逆的 "であり、"私が作ったmRNAワクチン技術をベースにしたこの遺伝子ワクチンの科学的事実 "を認識する必要があると、親たちに警告しています。

TRENDING: Is government-mandated medicine EVER justified?

TRENDING 政府が強制する医療は正当化され得るのか？

He spotlighted three key issues.

彼は3つの重要な問題にスポットを当てました。

The first is that the Pfizer and Modern mRNA vaccines inject a viral gene that forces the body to make toxic spike proteins.

1つ目は、ファイザー社とモダン社のmRNAワクチンは、ウイルスの遺伝子を注入することで、体内で毒性のあるスパイクタンパク質を作らせるというものです。

The proteins, he said, can cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including their:

このタンパク質は、子供たちの重要な器官に永久的な損傷を与える可能性があると言います。

• brain and nervous system
• heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
• reproductive system
• immune system
• - 脳と神経系
• - 心臓と血管（血栓を含む
• - 生殖器系
• - 免疫系

Emphasizing that such damage is irreparable, he said you can't fix lesions within the brain, heart tissue scarring or a "genetically reset immune system."

このようなダメージは修復不可能であることを強調し、脳内の病変や心臓組織の傷、"遺伝的にリセットされた免疫システム "を修復することはできないと述べています。

Secondly, he said, the novel vaccine technology has not been adequately tested.

第二に、この新しいワクチン技術は十分にテストされていないと述べています。

The vaccines were introduced in record time, in less than a year, while at least five years of testing and research is needed before the risks can be understood,

ワクチンは1年以内という記録的な速さで導入されましたが、一方でリスクを把握するには少なくとも5年間の試験・研究が必要です。

"Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history," he said.

「自分の子供を、人類史上最も過激な医療実験に参加させたいかどうか、自分自身に問いかけてみてください」。

Finally, Malone contended that the reason public health officials are "giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie."

最後にマローンは、公衆衛生局が "子供にワクチンを接種するようにと言っている理由は嘘だ "と主張した。

"Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents, he said. "Ir's actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease."

"あなたの子供は、両親や祖父母にとって何の危険もありません。「それどころか、その逆です。COVIDを接種した子供たちの免疫力は、この病気から世界を救うとまではいかなくても、あなたの家族を救うためには不可欠なのです。"

In summary, Malone said there is "no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives."

要約すると、マローン氏は、"親として、あなたやあなたの子供が一生付き合っていかなければならないかもしれないワクチンの既知の健康リスクを考えると、ウイルスの小さなリスクに対して、あなたの子供やあなたの家族にワクチンを接種するメリットはない "と述べています。

"The risk-benefit analysis isn’t even close," he said.

「リスクとベネフィットがかけ離れている」

"As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children."

"親として、祖父母として、私が皆さんにお勧めするのは、子供たちを守るために抵抗し、闘うことです。"

In an 80-minute video interview with WND earlier this month, Malone explained why he opposes universal vaccination for the COVID-19 virus and why he's been willing to risk the reputation he's cultivated over three decades and weather the scorn of the government and health-care establishment.

マローン氏は、今月初めにWNDと行った80分のビデオインタビューで、COVID-19ウイルスのユニバーサル・ワクチン接種に反対する理由と、30年以上かけて培ってきた評判を危険にさらしてまで、政府や医療関係者の侮蔑を受けようとした理由を説明した。

He is assisting two major efforts, as WND reported, the grassroots Unity Project opposing vaccine mandates and the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists that was launched by the Global Covid Summit.

WNDが報じたように、彼は、ワクチンの義務化に反対する草の根の「Unity Project」と、「Global Covid Summit」で発足した「International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists」という2つの大きな取り組みに協力しています。

Dr. Paul Alexander, a former adviser to the World Health Organization and the Department of Health and Human Services, agrees with Malone, writing on SubStack that for young children, who have a statistical risk of zero serious adverse effects from COVID infection, vaccination for COVID-19 is "all risk and no benefit," warning thousands of children could die.

世界保健機関と厚生省の元顧問であるポール・アレクサンダー博士もマローン氏に同調し、COVID感染による重篤な副作用が統計的にゼロである幼児にとって、COVID-19のワクチン接種は「オールリスク・ノーベネフィット」であり、何千人もの子供が死ぬ可能性があると警告しているとSubStackに書いている。

He charged that public officials advocating the vaccination of children for COVID -- including White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, NIH Director Francis Collins and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla -- "are in my view criminal."

ホワイトハウスのコロナウイルスアドバイザーであるアンソニー・ファウチ博士、CDC所長のロッシェル・ワレンスキー氏、NIH所長のフランシス・コリンズ氏、ファイザー社CEOのアルバート・ボーラ氏など、COVIDの子供へのワクチン接種を提唱している公務員は、「私の考えでは犯罪者です」と訴えました。

"They cannot, to this day, prosecute the case for why they are pushing this," he said. "They can only say 'take the jab' but cannot tell us why or provide any data or evidence why."

「彼らは今日に至るまで、なぜこれを推進しているのかを訴求することができません」と彼は言います。彼らは "注射を打て "と言うだけで、その理由やデータ、証拠を示すことができないのです」。

He argued children have a "pre-activated potent innate immunity (innate antibodies and innate cellular immunity as well as other components of the innate) that is their first line of defense and which has protected them against a broad range of pathogen including COVID virus."

彼は、子どもたちが「第一の防御ラインであり、COVIDウイルスを含む幅広い病原体から身を守る、あらかじめ活性化された強力な自然免疫（自然抗体、自然細胞免疫、および自然免疫の他の構成要素）」を持っていると主張した。

"It always has and this is why the morbidity and mortality burden on them has been so low, so vanishingly low," said Alexander.

「だからこそ、彼らの罹患率や死亡率が非常に低いのです」とアレクサンダーは言います。

He cited a recent German study and a Swedish study showing no COVID deaths in healthy children with no medical conditions.

彼は、最近のドイツの研究とスウェーデンの研究で、病状のない健康な子供たちにCOVIDによる死亡例がなかったことを紹介しました。

Johns Hopkins University professor Dr. Marty Makary has pointed out that the small number of children who suffer serious effects from COVID typically have an underlying illness, including obesity.

ジョンズ・ホプキンス大学のマーティ・マカリィ教授は、COVIDによって深刻な影響を受ける少数の子供たちは、通常、肥満を含む基礎疾患を抱えていると指摘しています。

Makary said Monday via Twitter that he will testify to Congress this week that COVID policies are not based on clinical data, including requiring a booster shot for a "young healthy low-risk study who already has natural immunity."

マカリー氏は月曜日にツイッターで、COVIDの方針が臨床データに基づいていないことを今週中に議会で証言すると述べています。その中には、「すでに自然免疫を持っている健康な若い低リスクの研究者」にブースターショットを要求することも含まれています。

I'm looking forward to testifying before congress this week on how Covid policies are no longer based on clinical data.

今週の議会で、Covid社の方針がもはや臨床データに基づいていないことを証言するのを楽しみにしています。

Nothing captures the problem more than this--requiring a booster in a young healthy low-risk student who already has natural imm. Omicron inaccurately cited... pic.twitter.com/O3maQr70vZ

— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) December 13, 2021

これほど問題を捉えているものはありません--すでに自然免疫を持っている若い健康なローリスクの学生にブースターを要求することです。オミクロンは不正確に引用されていますが... pic.twitter.com/O3maQr70vZ

- マーティ・マカリー MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) 2021年12月13日

"We are driving to vaccinate children on falsehoods and I would prefer to use the term 'lies,'" Alexander said. "We must stop this now for we can hurt many, and parents must stand up now and stop this!"

アレクサンダー氏は、「私たちは、虚偽の事実に基づいて子どもたちにワクチンを接種しようとしていますが、私は『嘘』という言葉を使いたいと思っています。"私たちは多くの人を傷つける可能性があるため、今すぐこれを止めなければなりません。親たちは今すぐ立ち上がって、これを止めなければなりません！"

After 22 months, he said, children have been shown to have "a very low risk of acquiring infection in the first place, of spreading to other children, of spreading to adults and teachers, of taking it home, of getting seriously ill, or of dying from COVID."

22か月後、子どもたちは "そもそも感染するリスクも、他の子どもたちに感染するリスクも、大人や先生に感染するリスクも、家に持ち帰るリスクも、重症化するリスクも、COVIDが原因で死亡するリスクも、非常に低い "ことが示されたという。

"Plain and simple and there is no evidence anywhere, I say anywhere, anywhere in this entire world for 22 months now that shows otherwise, for any variant!" Alexander said.

「この22ヶ月間、世界中のどこにも、そうでないことを示す証拠は何もありませんでした。とアレクサンダーは言った。

"I plead with parents to step back and think carefully about this, for these vaccines were not studied for the proper duration and do not provide the type of safety testing data needed for us to 'exclude harms' as part of informed evidence-based decision-making."

これらのワクチンは適切な期間の研究が行われておらず、情報に基づいた証拠による意思決定の一環として「有害性の除外」を行うために必要な種類の安全性試験データが提供されていないからです。

On Sunday, Fauci insisted in an interview with ABC's "This Week" that children as young as 5 should get vaccinated against COVID-19.

日曜日、ファウチ氏はABCの「This Week」のインタビューで、5歳の子供にもCOVID-19のワクチンを接種すべきだと主張しました。

Host George Stephanopoulos, noting fewer than 1 in 5 eligible children have received the vaccine, asked Fauci what his message is for "reluctant parents."

司会のジョージ・ステファノプロス氏は、対象となる子供の5人に1人しかワクチンを受けていないことを指摘し、「消極的な親」へのメッセージをファウチ氏に尋ねました。

"Well, my message to parents is, if your child is 5 years of age and older, please get them vaccinated. We need to protect the children," he said.

"さて、親御さんへのメッセージは、お子さんが5歳以上であれば、ぜひ予防接種を受けてください。私たちは子どもたちを守らなければなりません」と語りました。

Fauci contended the "idea that children are not vulnerable at all is not so, George."

Fauci氏は、"子供は全く脆弱ではないという考えはそうではない、ジョージ "と主張しました。

"I mean certainly, statistically, children do not get as severe disease as the adults, particularly the elderly. But if you look at the number of cases of children now, well over 2 million children from 5 to 11 have been infected," Fauci said.

「確かに統計的には、子供は大人、特に高齢者ほど重症化しないということです。しかし、子供の感染者数を見ると、5歳から11歳までの200万人以上の子供が感染しています」とファウチ氏。

"There have been over 8,000 to 9,000 hospitalizations and well over a hundred deaths," he continued.

「8,000～9,000人以上の入院と、100人以上の死亡者が出ています」と続けました。

"So it's not only good for the health of the child, but also to prevent the spread in the community," said Fauci. "So we have a very safe and highly effective vaccine for everyone, including children five to 11. And that's the reason why we encourage parents to get their children vaccinated."

「子供の健康に良いだけでなく、地域社会での感染を防ぐことができます」とファウチ氏。「5歳から11歳までの子どもを含むすべての人に、非常に安全で効果の高いワクチンを用意しています。ですから、5歳から11歳までの子どもを含め、すべての人に安全で効果の高いワクチンがあります。

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, over the course of the pandemic -- from Jan. 1, 2020, to Nov. 3, 2021 -- 576 children under age 18 died of COVID-19 in a population of about 74 million, which statistically means there is zero risk of death. Further, the CDC's record of deaths attributed to COVID-19 doesn't tell the whole story. A study of 48,000 COVID-infected children under 18 found no deaths were reported among those without comorbidities, or underlying chronic conditions, such as leukemia or obesity.

疾病管理予防センターによると、パンデミックの期間中--2020年1月1日から2021年11月3日まで--約7,400万人の人口の中でCOVID-19により死亡した18歳未満の子どもは576人であり、統計的には死亡のリスクがゼロであることを意味しています。さらに、CDCのCOVID-19に起因する死亡例の記録は、すべてを物語っているわけではありません。COVIDに感染した18歳未満の子供48,000人を対象とした調査では、白血病や肥満などの併存疾患、つまり基礎となる慢性疾患を持たない子供の死亡例は報告されていません。

A major new study found that not one healthy child in Germany from ages 5 to 18 died of COVID-19 during the first 15 months of the pandemic. With more than 80 million people, including about 10 million school-aged children and adolescents, Germany is Europe’s largest country.

ドイツでは、パンデミックが発生してから15ヵ月間、5歳から18歳までの健康な子どもが1人もCOVID-19で死亡していないことが、新しい大規模な研究で明らかになりました。ドイツは、8,000万人以上の人口を抱え、そのうち約1,000万人が学齢期の子どもや青年であるヨーロッパ最大の国です。

See Fauci's remarks:

Fauci氏の発言をご覧ください。

Fauci BEGS parents to “vaccinate” kids: “This idea that children are not vulnerable at all is not so.”pic.twitter.com/4ZtoQ2EkZd

ファウチは子供に「ワクチン」を接種するよう親に懇願。"子供は全く脆弱ではないというこの考えは、そうではありません。" pic.twitter.com/4ZtoQ2EkZd

— Suburban Black Man 🇺🇸 (@goodblackdude) December 12, 2021

- 郊外のブラックマン🇺🇸 (@goodblackdude) 2021年12月12日

EDITOR'S NOTE: Last year, America's doctors, nurses and paramedics were celebrated as frontline heroes battling a fearsome new pandemic. Today, under Joe Biden, tens of thousands of these same heroes are denounced as rebels, conspiracy theorists, extremists and potential terrorists. Along with massive numbers of police, firemen, Border Patrol agents, Navy SEALs, pilots, air-traffic controllers, and countless other truly essential Americans, they're all considered so dangerous as to merit termination, their professional and personal lives turned upside down due to their decision not to be injected with the experimental COVID vaccines. Biden’s tyrannical mandate threatens to cripple American society – from law enforcement to airlines to commercial supply chains to hospitals. It's already happening. But the good news is that huge numbers of "yesterday’s heroes" are now fighting back – bravely and boldly. The whole epic showdown is laid out as never before in the sensational October issue of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled "THE GREAT AMERICAN REBELLION: 'We will not comply!' COVID-19 power grab ignites bold new era of national defiance."

編集部注：昨年、アメリカの医師、看護師、救急隊員は、恐ろしい新型パンデミックと闘う最前線のヒーローとして称えられました。今日、ジョー・バイデンの下で、何万人もの同じヒーローたちが、反逆者、陰謀論者、過激派、潜在的なテロリストとして糾弾されています。膨大な数の警察官、消防士、国境警備隊員、ネイビーシールズ、パイロット、航空管制官など、真に必要なアメリカ人が、実験的なCOVIDワクチンを接種しないという決断をしたことで、解雇に値するほど危険な存在とみなされ、仕事も私生活もひっくり返されてしまうのです。バイデン氏の専制的な命令は、法執行機関、航空会社、商業サプライチェーン、病院など、アメリカ社会を麻痺させる恐れがあります。それはすでに起こっています。しかし、良いニュースは、膨大な数の「昨日のヒーロー」たちが、勇気を持って大胆に反撃していることです。WNDの月刊誌「Whistleblower」10月号のセンセーショナルな記事「THE GREAT AMERICAN REBELLION: 'We will not comply!'」では、この壮大な対決の全貌が、これまでにない形で描かれています。COVID-19の権力掌握は、国家の反抗の大胆な新時代に火をつける」と題されています。

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!